Create an account
Ok. I get these Kucinich updates every day, and I don't share them… - The Life and Thoughts of Zach
Dec. 13th, 2003
Leave a comment
December 15th, 2003 10:28 pm (UTC)
My understanding is that if more people are living longer and not dying before retirement, then more people are paying more money into social security. Remember that there are death benefits to SS , so just because someone dies doesn't mean that the money they paid all their life into social security goes to someone else. If someone dies, their surviving spouse gets some benefits.
Social Security is a system of forced savings with a progressive structure. So rich people put in a little more than they get out and poor people get out a little more than they put in but on average it's just making payouts based on interested earned on money put into the system over a lifetime of work. It isn't predicated on death and if it ever received a slight advantage from early death (I don't know if it did or didn't) that should be easily corrected for by tweaking the numbers a bit.
Politicians would be prevented from raiding by enacting specific laws disallowing the government to borrow more than a certain amount from the SS trust fund and to have constant electoral vigilance to keep that protection as a priority. Note that "raiding" might not be entirely accurate. The money hasn't been stolen. It has been borrowed. If the government manages to pay it back without resorting to simply printing more money and causing devaluation of the dollar then nothing will go wrong. The issue here has NOTHING to do with Social Security and everything to do with unsound fiscal management by the government over the past 20+ years. If it wasn't SS that was in trouble it'd be whatever other creditor loaned huge stacks of cash to a nation already deeply in debt.