?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Why are they in it? - The Life and Thoughts of Zach

Jan. 30th, 2004

02:59 pm - Why are they in it?

Previous Entry Share Next Entry

While Dean supporters are no longer in it for the money (which means they've gotta all be in it for the nookie) it would appear that Kerry supporters are in it for the booze.



(Apologies for the NYT links, use groogroo/groogroo or unknown/unknown as your login. Thanks to notesfilers for these references.)

Comments:

[User Picture]
From:ke_jia
Date:January 30th, 2004 09:54 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Or, go to userland to grab free, full-text permalinks to all of the the current day's stories; links that bypass the registration firewall. Use your favorite newsreader, or pick through the files by hand ...

Again, I say, permanent links. Pretty cool. Of course, if I was really bad-ass, I would come through with those fabled links myself, and post them here. Alas, I have not yet installed (created, actually) a newsreader to call my own.

Soon, soon I will have a database of rss feeds that, er, would allow me to do something like that. Dating from when I create it.

Sometime soon. Watch me closely! Sooon ...
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:hssst
Date:January 30th, 2004 10:08 pm (UTC)

ha!

(Link)
That "voldemort/ashcroft 2004" is fantastic!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:galactose
Date:January 30th, 2004 10:28 pm (UTC)
(Link)
at least they're recycling. *shrugs*
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:zarfmouse
Date:January 30th, 2004 10:32 pm (UTC)

Re:

(Link)
True!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:szasz
Date:January 30th, 2004 10:42 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Maybe she just seems to be my type, but from the looks of ol' Heidi Kraus, I wouldn't mind supporting Kerry for the nookie, either! :)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:zarfmouse
Date:January 30th, 2004 10:46 pm (UTC)

Re:

(Link)
I agree. Though the way political campaigns go I'm sure she's probably a bit on the young side for both of us.

Though I heard today the "rule" is half your age plus 7 years. So for me 20-40 is the "rule".
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:szasz
Date:January 30th, 2004 10:51 pm (UTC)

Re:

(Link)
Yeah, A/2+7 is what I've heard, too. That means anyone under 26 is "yuck" for me. I dunno, I'd believe she's that age. :)

Then again, my best friend is 21, so who knows. I believe in keeping wide age ranges for friends; helps one's perspective. Another friend of mine is in his 50's.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:zarfmouse
Date:January 30th, 2004 10:56 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I just fundamentally can't tell what age people are between 20 and 35 or so (and again between 30 and 45).

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:szasz
Date:January 30th, 2004 11:06 pm (UTC)

Re:

(Link)
It's all about the plausible deniability, man.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:zarfmouse
Date:January 30th, 2004 11:10 pm (UTC)

Re:

(Link)
I can neither confirm nor deny the veracity of your remarks.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)